Publication
La Cour suprême du Canada tranche : les cadres ne pourront se syndiquer au Québec
Le 19 avril dernier, la Cour suprême du Canada a rendu une décision fort attendue en matière de syndicalisation des cadres.
IP risks and other social media pitfalls that could hurt companies | Global law firm | Norton Rose Fulbright
Mondial | Publication | March 13, 2017
Although the risk of falling victim to fake news purveyors, cyber squatters and similar social media pitfalls is growing exponentially, many companies in South Africa are still not prioritising the protection of their intellectual property (IP).
“A lot of people don’t know what the recourse available to them is, if their IP is infringed, and companies are not protecting some things. For example, some companies spend a fortune on graphic design for their branding but when you suggest registering a trade mark, they say there is so much internal red tape in obtaining the necessary approvals to spend their legal budget on protecting their IP,” says Sinal Govender, an IP lawyer at Norton Rose Fulbright’s Johannesburg offices.
“Social media can be, just as bad as it is good, if not worse. Sharing information on social media platforms gets faster and easier every day, which is great in terms of advertising, but at the same time the risk to companies is growing exponentially. In fact, the risk is limitless,” Govender said, pointing to the surge in confusion about the source of information online.
Govender said companies can avert considerable brand and reputational damage - not to mention costs - by being proactive rather than reactive in protecting their IP in the social media age. “Setting things up properly at the beginning is the best way to protect your company. If you can provide Facebook or Twitter with a registration certificate showing that it’s your trade mark being wrongfully used in a post, they will take steps to remove the offending post or user. Trademark infringement can only occur when you have a registered trade mark. If not, you have to rely on common law rights to establish a case of passing-off. This comes with its own difficulties, as it is costly, and time-consuming.”
Listing the five main social media-related risks to a company, Govender said that these are infringement, defamation, cyber squatters, passing off and brand or trade mark dilution.
Cyber squatters are making big business out of using domain names that are identical to or very similar to a company’s brand, she said. They can use these domain names to lure consumers to a fake website, where the aim is to defraud unwitting consumers by obtaining their personal details or deceiving them into thinking that they are purchasing genuine goods. They can also try to sell these domain names to the truthful brand owner for a profit.
There is also a risk of passing off, where imposters claim to be associated with a brand but are not. This is becoming increasingly common, as is brand dilution, where uncontrolled hashtag use could potentially cause brands to be “thrown around the internet - and not in the way you want it to be”.
Companies or individuals being disparaged, with apparent impunity, on social media platforms is also on the rise, along with trademark and copyright infringement. “With copyright infringement, the assumption is that all information emanating from the internet is free to use”, Govender said. Adding to the problem of copyright infringement is the sheer speed and ease at which infringing material can be spread on social media.
Key steps companies can take to mitigate their IP risk on social media:
This article first appeared in Business Day Law and Tax review
Publication
Le 19 avril dernier, la Cour suprême du Canada a rendu une décision fort attendue en matière de syndicalisation des cadres.
Publication
Le budget 2024 propose d’élargir la portée de certains pouvoirs permettant à l’ARC de demander des renseignements aux contribuables tout en prévoyant de nouvelles conséquences pour les contribuables contrevenants.
Publication
L'impôt minimum de remplacement (IMR) est un impôt sur le revenu additionnel prévu dans la Loi de l’impôt sur le revenu (Canada) (la « Loi ») auquel sont assujettis les particuliers et certaines fiducies qui pourraient autrement avoir recours à certaines déductions et exemptions et à certains crédits pour réduire leur impôt sur le revenu fédéral canadien régulier.
Abonnez-vous et restez à l’affût des nouvelles juridiques, informations et événements les plus récents...
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023